![]() ĮLAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 is 20mm narrower and 44mm less deeper than KEF LS50 but it is also 39mm taller.īelow you can see the front view size comparison of KEF LS50 and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 in scale.Ĭomparison image of KEF LS50 and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5. In this section, we are going to compare KEF LS50's and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's external dimensions. Size of a speaker can sometimes become an important decision factor due to space constraints or in some cases purely for esthetic reasons. ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to KEF LS50 with its rear-firing port. ![]() LS50 has a rear firing port whereas Debut 2.0 B5.2 has a front firing ports. None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring.ĮLAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's 5-Way Metal post terminals LS50 features 5-Way Metal post type posts and Debut 2.0 B5.2 has a 5-Way Metal post type posts. ![]() Such as Impedance, sensitivity and system efficiencies. Loudness or the sound level is also impacted by parameters Keep in mind that a higher max power handling value doesn't necessarily make that a louder speakerĬompared to a lower max handling speaker. LS50 can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS from the amp the whereas LS50 has a max power handling value of 100 watts RMS, 20 watts less than the Debut 2.0 B5.2. While using an amplifier within this range ensures the nominal performance, inputting a power that is higher than the max wattage can result in a damaged speaker. Klipsch RP-500M vs ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.Range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle. ĮLAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 is 2mm shorter and 7mm less deeper than Klipsch RP-500M but it is also 7mm wider.īelow you can see the front view size comparison of Klipsch RP-500M and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 in scale.Ĭomparison image of Klipsch RP-500M and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 Size and External Dimensions It wasn’t fully planned when I did the B5, but when starting work on the UB5 it made sense to use the same frontal dimensions so that I could use the same grille tool. In a conversation about the UB5’s conception, Jones said, The enclosure is a development from the B5. Klipsch RP-500M has external dimensions of 343.0 x 173.0 x 241.0mm ( 13.5 x 6.8 x 9.4inch) whereas ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2 has external dimensions of 341.0 x 180.0 x 234.0mm ( 13.4 x 7.0 x 9.2inch). Like the Debut line, it’s nicely finished in black brushed vinyl. In this section, we are going to compare Klipsch RP-500M's and ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's external dimensions. ELAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's front-firing port gives more flexibility in placement in regards to proximity to walls compared to Klipsch RP-500M with its rear-firing port. RP-500M has a rear firing port whereas Debut 2.0 B5.2 has a front firing ports. Klipsch RP-500M's Single binding posts terminalsĮLAC Debut 2.0 B5.2's 5-Way Metal post terminals None of these speakers feature bi-amping/bi-wiring. ![]() RP-500M features 5-Way Metal post type posts and Debut 2.0 B5.2 has a 5-Way Metal post type posts. RP-500M can handle a max power of 120 watts RMS from the amp the whereas RP-500M has a max power handling value of 75 watts RMS, 45 watts less than the Debut 2.0 B5.2. Range is the range of input power in watts RMS that a loudspeaker is designed to handle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |